Franchising will not replace the personal bond a customer has with a local owner-operator. Still, it can make small businesses stronger and help brands scale quality service across many communities. When it is managed well, franchising can create jobs, expand access to products and services, and give entrepreneurs a structured path to ownership.

Overview

Franchising is a major part of the American economy. It shows up in nearly every consumer-facing sector, from food and retail to home services, fitness, education, and health-related services. It includes large national brands as well as smaller regional systems. For many owners, franchising offers a proven playbook, brand recognition, and shared marketing support.

At the same time, the model has built-in tension. Franchisees carry day-to-day operating risk, while franchisors control the brand standards and system rules. Because of that split, disagreements often center on control, costs, and whether the system is allocating risk fairly.

The COVID-19 period intensified these challenges. Many franchisees lost revenue during shutdowns and faced strained cash reserves. Consumer behavior also shifted toward online ordering, delivery, and convenience-based services. In some systems, that shift required major changes in operations, marketing, and technology, and it also raised hard questions about how online sales should be credited to local operators.

Over the last several years, more attention has also been placed on fairness and transparency in franchise relationships. In the United States, these concerns commonly show up around disclosure, contract terms, renewals and exits, fee structures, marketing fund use, territory protection, and how disputes are handled. Efforts to improve clarity can protect franchisees, but additional rules and compliance demands can also slow decision-making when market conditions change quickly.

Key challenges

For franchisors, one major challenge is balancing consistency with speed. A franchise system must protect the brand while staying flexible enough to respond to economic shifts. When demand changes quickly, franchisors may need to update operating requirements, roll out new products, or redesign customer channels. Those changes can be difficult if franchisees do not have the capital to invest, or if the system lacks clear processes for funding and rollout.

Supply chain instability has also remained a persistent issue. Rising input costs, shipping delays, and vendor disruptions can pressure margins and create uneven customer experiences across locations. Some brands respond by increasing inventory levels, but that ties up working capital and can create losses if demand does not match expectations.

Brand and compliance risk is another major pressure point. One location’s wage and hour violations, customer service failures, or safety problems can damage the entire network’s reputation. Franchisors may also face scrutiny regarding oversight practices, especially when issues appear widespread. In some situations, brands may choose to buy back locations or shift a portion of the footprint to company-owned stores to regain control and reduce volatility.

For franchisees, the core challenge is often financial and operational flexibility. Franchisees manage rent, labor, local marketing execution, and daily operations, while also paying royalties and contributing to marketing funds. When revenue drops or costs spike, franchisees may have limited room to adjust pricing, suppliers, staffing models, or offerings if the franchise agreement restricts those changes.

Territory and channel conflict can also be a flashpoint. As more consumer purchasing moves online, franchisees can feel exposed if digital sales are not attributed fairly or if they believe the brand’s online strategy is competing with local stores rather than supporting them.

Labor remains a major constraint as well. Many franchise concepts depend on consistent staffing, but wage pressure and hiring challenges can reduce service quality and limit hours of operation. Franchisees may also feel reputational spillover from problems elsewhere in the system. Even a well-run location can be affected by negative publicity tied to the broader brand.

The future

Franchising will continue to be a major ownership model in the United States because it can work well when incentives are aligned and expectations are clear. Strong systems will likely be the ones that invest in franchisee economics, communicate transparently, and build practical support that improves unit-level performance.

Growth is still available, especially in service-based concepts and brands that can deliver a consistent customer experience while adapting to new buying habits. However, the systems that thrive will be those that can reduce friction between franchisor strategy and franchisee reality, improve transparency around costs and value, and create a model that remains sustainable for both sides under changing conditions.

‍